HR 142 · 119th Congress — Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2025
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 20 25 This bill revises parts relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking. Specifically, the bill establishes a congressional approval process for a major rule. A major…
- Congress
- 119
- Bill
- HR 142
- Status
- Introduced
- Introduced
- 2025-01-03
- Latest action date
- 2025-01-03
Summary
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 20 25 This bill revises parts relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking. Specifically, the bill establishes a congressional approval process for a major rule. A major rule may only take effect if Congress approves of the rule. A major rule is a rule that has resulted in or is likely to result in (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U. S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. Right now, the latest action is: Sent to the Judiciary Committee, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be later determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such parts as fall within the area of responsibility of the committee concerned. The listed sponsor is Rep. Cammack, Kat [R-FL-3] [R].
This summary may describe an earlier version. Check the official record for current wording.
Latest action
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsors
- Rep. Cammack, Kat [R-FL-3]
Republican · Florida · House District 3 · Republican